Making Your Own Super Briefs

Artificial Intelligence Case briefs

We knew about Artificial Intelligence in the law field in December 2003, but were forced to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement to keep the information confidential for two years. Dean’s Law Dictionary was created in 2002 with an AI program that ran on a custom FPGA Super Computer.

What can you say about artificial intelligence computer programs that are smart enough to look at all the relevant uses of a case from a database of over 630,000 cases to determine the actual true holding of a case? We could only think of the word Super!

The supercomputer tells you what the case is about as it looks at all the uses of the case when it is cited by other cases. Then it formulates a relevant connection probability of how the case is viewed in usage by majority holdings, dissents, and plurality holdings, and not merely when it was decided. In the case of Dean’s Law Dictionary, it uses this process to determine the meaning and various theories of law related to idiomatic concepts used in the law. This is extremely helpful because understanding and being able to apply idiomatic law is what law school is all about.

It is a whole different story to use a neural network to generate case briefs. Using a neural network as an AI surrogate, which is what most online companies offering casebriefs do, is easy to spot. If you test such briefs on https://gptzero.me/ they show as being generated by AI. If you don’t do neural networking and you use Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) to create your programming logic, it appears 100% human. So our advice is, get some “Human” case briefs and modify them. Time is your enemy, and modifying something saves a lot of time.

Take a close look at this article: https://casebriefsco.com/blog-details/the-new-case-brief-bogeyman-is-coming-for-you-and-it-s-artificial-intelligence-ai

Modify Case Briefs that are “Human” and brief the Entire Case.

Casebriefsco.com provides briefs for a large number of the entire case and not just the edited casebook version, but not for all of them. We read through one set of these case briefs from a constitutional law book, and we must say that by doing a case brief of the entire case, we saw each major area of the law portrayed substantially more times than in the casebook itself. The casebook only had 3 cases on matters related to standing, but we read about standing in 24 cases, which the casebook had edited out of cases presented after you were supposed to have your epiphany on standing from the 3 examples given. Needless to say, we now know a lot more about standing; a lot more than someone just reading the 3 cases and only doing the case brief for what was in the casebook.

We also have to confess, we also use Dean’s Law Dictionary for learning everything we need to know about idiomatic law, such as standing. So you can either use Dean’s or brief the entire case.

We also got a great laugh when we realized that most casebooks edit out dissents that frame the majority holdings. Dissents make it too easy for students to understand the theories of the cases. You have to find some reason for charging $60,000-$80,000 per year for law school, and editing the cases in the case books is certainly a good scam. If it fundamentally is not hard, you have to make it hard. Editing out dissents from cases in casebooks makes it very hard to case brief those cases. Case briefs from Casebriefsco.com put them back in and brief them for you.

Most of all, you can edit digital case briefs and take them to class, printed or on your computer.

Taking a fully canned brief and your editing it is the fastest way to be ready for class with an excellent brief and a lot of time left over for doing what is important, memorizing the law, and practicing exam writing.

Always Try it for FREE before you Buy Any Digital Product.

Never purchase a digital product online unless you can try before you buy, and they have real tech support with real phone numbers!